Saturday, July 26, 2014

Is Porn industry attorney Ronald D. Green attempting to frame Alexandra Mayers fka Monica Foster as a stalker? The evidence.

***UPDATE: The stalkers Alexandra Mayers named in this legal issue obtained the Early Court Conference Report Alexandra filed in regards to this issue and posted it on the porn news gossip blog they operate - but not in it's entirety or with truthful commentary. Download the complete papers & the exhibits here.

As many who follow the pornographic industry news know, Alexandra Mayers fka Monica Foster is currently being sued by a client represented by pornographic industry attorney Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group in Las Vegas, Nevada.  The client is the wife of Ronald D. Green's business partner and employer.

Since Ronald D. Green and his client filed the lawsuit in April of 2014  (which they unsuccessfully attempted to settle out of court a few days later), it appears Green has been abusing the legal system to fight Alexandra Mayers' constitutional rights to represent herself and defend herself in court. Due to the financial difficulty Alexandra Mayers is currently facing, to defend herself in the lawsuit the Nevada courts granted her In Forma Pauperis status (a "fee waiver" for her court filings).  Ronald D. Green immediately filed an opposition to Mayers' In Forma Pauperis in May of 2014.

On June 2, 2014 Ronald D. Green's employer and partner at Randazza Legal Group filed for a protective order against Alexandra Mayers based on public tweets (which were not sent to him directly) that he perceived as threats against himself, wife and family.   Though Alexandra Mayers never contacted Ronald D. Green's employer and partner at Randazza Legal Group or his family via telephone, has never met him in person and asked him on multiple occasions to cease communication with her via email (he habitually emailed her - click here for details)  he felt the need to attain a protective order against her which specifically stated that she should be ordered to not visit the offices of Randazza Legal Group. 

Alexandra Mayers was unable to attend the protective order hearing on July 25, 2014 - so the protective order was granted by default to Ronald D. Green's partner and employer at Randazza Legal Group.

On July 22, 2014 Ronald D. Green submitted a Notice for an Early Case Conference to the courts and sent a certified copy of the notice to Alexandra Mayers.  HOWEVER, though Ronald D. Green was well aware that his partner and employer filed for a protective order against Alexandra Mayers as of June 2nd, 2014 - which INCLUDED the business address for Randazza Legal Group, the Early Case Conference paperwork which Ronald D. Green sent and signed HIMSELF lists Randazza Legal Group's office as the location for the conference (as you can see below).ronald d green randazza legal group after protective order 01 ronald d green randazza legal group after protective order 02

There is no way that Ronald D. Green did not know about the protective order that his employer and partner filed against Alexandra Mayers - so what exactly is Ronald D. Green doing?  Is he simply an inept attorney? Is he attempting to frame Alexandra Mayers as a stalker? Is this a method to obstruct justice? Or does Ronald D. Green have the agenda of painting Alexandra Mayers in the false light of being a threat to children due to the fact that in actuality Ronald D. Green's employer and business partner is an EXTREME THREAT TO CHILDREN considering his essay in the DEFENSE of a book entitled "The Pedophile's Guide" AND his professional association and affiliation with INTERNATIONALLY KNOWN CONVICTED PEDOPHILE August Kurt Brackob aka Kurt Treptow.

Was it Ronald D. Green impersonating his client in the electronic communication Alexandra Mayers received in late January - which is what led to this lawsuit?  It seems likely.

This is not the first time Ronald D. Green has been caught essentially committing fraud on the courts.  Independent Investigative blogger Crystal Cox (who recently won through a Federal Appeals court the same free speech protections for bloggers as traditional journalist) alleges that Ronald D. Green deliberately lied in  regards to her legal issues and stated he "flat out lies about his targets, distorts laws and makes things up purely to intentionally harm his victims".  Click here to read about the situation in detail. 

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Sex Trafficking News -

Please take a look at my newest awareness project:

The pornographic industry currently promotes, is directly connected to & is built on organized crime and sextrafficking. addresses the truths of the matter.
I believe that for ANY elements of the United States pornographic industry to successfully proceed into the future, their ties to organized crime and sex (human) trafficking must be severed completely.

Monday, July 07, 2014

Where Monica Foster ends... Alexandra Mayers begins.

Buckle up and prepare for the real ride.
Make sure you follow @AlexandraMayers on twitter if you don't already.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014


*Update: The afternoon after I posted this, click here to learn what else the pornographic industry threw at me for BEING MYSELF and exercising my legal & spiritual RIGHTS

*Update 6.19.2014: Today I achieved my first legal victory against Marc Randazza - he failed to succeed in getting what he wanted from a judge in court today.

*Update 7.01.2014: Today my Motion for Dismissal wasn't granted, however I was successful in getting everything on court record via my paperwork which needed to be.  Before the case began, I already won by allowing Jesus Christ in my life to restore & save my soul. I may not make it much longer, so please CLICK HERE to read my latest thoughts and evidence of the gangstalking (organized stalking) I've endured in a blog post I've entitled "Being in Porn Can Kill You, but Speaking Out About It is the Deadliest Part" .

I found the answers I was looking for. Click here to read the truth of how far the corruption goes in regards to the pornographic industry and politics:

If I died at this moment, I'd be OK with it. Everything (even elements I didn't anticipate) came full circle and I completed the puzzle.

My court date is July 1st, 2014. I don't even care as to the outcome. Anyone "fighting" me, in actuality is just fighting themselves.

I've been fortunate enough to do just about every single thing I've always wanted to do in life.  I even have had the opportunity to do music...just recently...and you know what's funny? I don't ever need anyone to hear it. I just wanted the chance to do it.

Friday, May 16, 2014

A chart and image map of the lawsuits I'm facing - the TRUTH of the porn industry & organized crime

This is a chart and image map of the lawsuits I'm facing. It is the TRUTH of the porn industry and organized crime.
click to enlarge and download
I am not mentally ill. I am not crazy. I am not a failure.

I am an intelligent woman who's brain is wired differently than most people's. I see things that escapes many, and I do my best to convey the best way I know how what I've noticed and experienced.

I have documented the history (to my knowledge) and my interactions with the above individuals: Diane Duke of the Free Speech Coalition, Sean Tompkins of TheRealPornWikiLeaks (TRPWL), Matthew Holder, Ari Bass aka Michael Whiteacre, Will Ryder aka Jeff Mullen, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, August Kurt Brackob aka Kurt Treptow and Julie Meadows aka Lydia Ann Lee on my various websites all linked through (namely,, &

Take a look at who's pulled pleadings in regards to this lawsuit . Jeff Mullen, Mathew Holder, Ari Bass - this will be on court record.

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Why is Randazza Legal Group trying to fight my constitutional rights?

Just a brief update in regards to my legal issue with Randazza Legal Group - as of May 12, 2014 an Opposition to my In Forma Pauperis was filed by Jennifer Randazza and her representation (in otherwords her husband and his buddies).

For those who aren't aware, an In Forma Pauperis is essentially a "fee waiver" for court costs. As you my long time friends & followers know, I'm broke - in part due to having dedicated much of my life over the past few years to my activism in regards to issues pertaining to the pornographic industry such as the elements of organized crime and the much needed enforcement of workplace (health) safety legislation.

So as of last night, I wrote the Courts a Reply to the Opposition of support of my In Forma Pauperis.  I need to redo my Affidavit for it (I didn't realize you had to itemize your income and assets), so I will as soon as possible.

I just don't get it. Randazza Legal Group should be good enough attorneys (Marc Randazza especially) to win fair and justly...shouldn't they? Why are they trying to fight my constitutional rights to be able to represent myself? They're a group of people with the scholastic background, professional experience and connections which amount to them essentially being a "Goliath" opposed to little 'ole me - a simple cam girl, ex-pornstar and blogger.

I'll keep you posted - you can download my reply to the court by clicking here.

FYI - Can you believe they dug up the issue of Lenny Dykstra in their Opposition? I mean COME ON!

Oh, and one more thing - it turns out I can attend court remotely via telephone :) Thank God for that little miracle considering I'm in fear for my life when it comes being in physical proximity to anyone attached to Marc Randazza and/or my stalkers who have stated on multiple occasions they'd be there.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Answer to the Civil Suit filed against me by Randazza Legal Group

***Update: As of today I have discovered, Randazza Legal Group utilized fraudulent (fake) escort ads featuring my webcam model photographs as evidence to oppose my In Forma Pauperis (fee waiver). Those fake ads were exactly why I had to change my phone number quite a while ago! 

WHY is it so difficult for Marc Randazza to understand that I AM NOT A PROSTITUTE? I AM A WEBCAM MODEL ONLY! In my view, this situation is more PROOF Randazza Legal Group is attempting to SEXTRAFFICK me into the Nevada legal brothels, strip clubs and/or back into the porn industry.

As of current, the ONLY people who regularly state that I'm an escort/prostitute/hooker are individuals Marc Randazza himself communicates with on twitter - my stalkers Ari Bass, Sean Tompkins & their associates.

Download my civil suit court case (filed against me by Randazza Legal Group) Motion to Dismiss here if you'd like to read it:

A court date for July 1st, 2014 has been set, however due to having received death, physical harm and rape threats from parties attached to Randazza Legal Group (of which March Randazza communicates with) who have stated that they will be attending, I will not be attending unless a miracle happens.

Keep in mind, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal group is the same man who just defended the racist Donald Sterling on CNN. In addition he (and the Free Speech Coalition) defends pedophilia and has been found to be affiliated with a known convicted pedophile.

In addition it appears that Matthew Holder, a close to 20 year pornographic industry cameraman (for studios such as Mile High Media & Penthouse) who I dated as an active pornstar is involved with Jennifer Randazza in the lawsuit. Matthew is not only the man who failed to disclose to me that he had Herpes and was involved in what resulted in an abortion of which I dealt with - in addition I was told by Keith Caggiano (of an adult novelty company called The Screaming O) after the final Halloween party I attended in Los Angeles, that Holder was my "pimp".

At this stage, just about everything in regards to the organized crime attached pornographic industry stalkers (who try to silence the truth) is now on court record via my Motion for Dismissal - and that was what needed to be done more so than anything else.

Monday, April 21, 2014

Debt Bondage, Sex Trafficking, Randazza Legal Group & Alexandra Mayers return to porn - a Monica At Home EASTER special

***Update 5/1/2014 : Twice now, individuals affiliated with Randazza Legal Group have posted the make and model of my vehicle on highly trafficked porn industry websites. The first time, was on by Marc Randazza and the second time today - on a website which links to a hardcore pornographic paysite controlled by 2 men who have stalked myself, family and various others for about 3 years now (Ari Scott Bass and Sean Tompkins). In addition, today my financial information along with my address was posted alongside a photograph of me of which Will Ryder aka Jeff Mullen (a porn director who in 2011 suggested that I commit suicide) OR Larry Flynt Productions (Hustler) owns the copyright to.

These actions by those affiliated with Randazza Legal Group appear to be an effort to incite physical harm (violence) against me and/or a murder. As of current I can not discuss the frivolous lawsuit of which Randazza Legal Group has filed against me seeking a judgement in excess of $50,000, but what I do know, is that the law suit appears to be an effort to attain my websites and sextraffick me into areas of the pornographic industry of which I'm not comfortable working in.

Click here for all the screencaps and evidence from today's webcast.

On today's special Easter edition of Monica At Home - I announce my possible return to the pornographic industry due to currently being named in a frivolous lawsuit by Jennifer of Randazza Legal Group - which is an effort to enslave me to Marc Randazza via debt bondage.

I believe Marc Randazza has a relationship with the Nevada brothels via Ari Bass aka Michael Whiteacre, Sean Tompkins (TRPWL) and Marc Spiegler. I believe their goal is to essentially sextraffick me into the Nevada legal brothel system by utilizing (and abusing) the Nevada courts to create a $10,000 debt of which I would have to pay to Jennifer Randazza if my motion to dismiss the lawsuit is not granted.

click to enlarge
In this webcast I will cover how associates of Marc Randazza (Randazza Legal Group) have habitually stalked, harassed, cyber bullied and defamed myself and family members (namely my father) over the years.

I will present evidence which shows communication between Marc Randazza and those who claimed to take down pornwikileaks, but did not - as well as evidence of which I believe points to the initial communication I received (of which I believed was from Jennifer Randazza) in actuality being a "set-up" by Randazza Legal Group in effort to establish grounds for a lawsuit.

click to enlarge
the truth of
Michael Whiteacre
In effort to not be forced into the Nevada Brothels via this lawsuit by Randazza Legal Group, I have opted to announce that I will return to the pornographic industry as a performer if a $10,000 legal judgement is made against me. As a solo independent webcam girl I don't believe I could pay off a $10,000 in the time given to me, but by re-entering the pornographic industry I may be able to.

Regardless, I fear for my life at this stage. If I return to pornography I believe I am bound to contract HIV / AIDS - so if the Nevada courts rule against me - they are essentially a party to manslaughter (aka murder).

I believe the current situation of which I'm in, is solid evidence of how the pornographic industry will not allow performers to leave (or speak out).
Click to enlarge - proof in the form of a comment from an adult industry blog that since 2011 Sean Tompkins aka TRPWL has been working with people I believe to be attached to organized crime within the pornographic industry (within the Free Speech Coalition) to file a fraudulent civil lawsuit against me.

Friday, April 18, 2014

Monica Foster at Home 2014 - Thursday 04-17-2014

On this webcast I discuss the truth of what I feel Michael Weinstein of the Aids Healthcare Foundation is really up against, why I feel his safety and life is in danger of an anti-Semitic hate crime and why every pornstar's life is currently in danger of a major corporation who's willing to put profits above the health and safety of human lives.

As of current a gay male model and pornstar by the name of Eric Paul Leue has created a petition on in effort to force Michael Weinstein to resign. The petition is "officially" backed by the Free Speech Coalition and Xbiz magazine, but I'm also under the impression that Eric Paul Leue is backed by the multi-million dollar pharmaceutical Gilead Sciences - the manufacturers of Truvada (a medication being marketed as "the new condom" though it doesn't protect against STDs other than HIV - further more the clinical definitive findings will not be published about Truvada until 2017).

At this stage, I feel that Gilead Sciences has targeted the Aids Healthcare Foundation and the Free Speech Coalition as a means of not only marketing Truvada, but a way to gain access to female pornstars to use as a "test subject" pool for Truvada clinical studies. As of current though Truvada has been found to be very effective in males, it hasn't been equally effective in clinical trials for females.

As of current Michael Weinstein in my view is the only person standing between female pornstars being used essentially as "lab rats" and Gilead Sciences.

Condom legislation must be adhered to and mandatory condom usage must be present in adult filming.

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Monica Foster at Home 2014 - Tuesday 04-15-2014

Monica Foster at Home - LIVE - a daily webcast commentary hosted by Alexandra aka Monica Foster on the topics of News, Gossip & Life pertaining to the Mainstream & Porn / Adult Entertainment Industry.

Today I give my closing statements for the week in regards to Tiffany Fox, organized crime, the Los Angeles porn industry and why a scholarship fund needs to be created for young women who speak out in regards to sex trafficking in the pornographic industry (which has essentially become a modern day slave system due to illegal escort and prostitution rings such as The Luxury Companion).

Monday, April 14, 2014

Monica Foster at Home 2014 - Monday 04-14-2014

Exclusive interview with Tiffany Fox (@RealTiffanyFox) - a young pornstar who has spoken out against sex trafficking in the porn industry (most notably LA Direct Models and The Luxury Companion) -a feature article on Tiffany Fox and this situation can be found on by clicking here.

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Monica Foster at Home 2014 - Friday 04-11-2014

This is a breaking news webcast in regards to Tiffany Fox aka Tiffany D'Gore (RealTiffanyFox), a young pornstar who has stated on twitter that Derek Hay of La Direct models not only wouldn't let her out of contract, but in addition has sex traffcked and sent to privates (aka escorting and/or prostitution gigs) rather than legitimate shoots.

Pornstars Natalia and Natasha Starr (the Starr sisters) have made similar allegations against Derek Hay in the past. Pornstar Lisa Ann aka Nailin' Pailin ( @theRealLisaAnn - she played Sarah Pailin in a porn parody) has come to Tiffany Fox's defense and has explained exactly how Derek Hay and LA direct model sextrafficks, women, blackmails pornstars and takes over their online adult industry aliases by registering their domain names and online presence.

In addition I discuss that fact that as of today of I was served with court papers of which I'm being sued for $10,000 by Jennifer Randazza (wife of pornographic industry attorney and public figure Marc Randazza - who defends child pornography, pedophilia and child abuse) for alleged defamation - which is strange considering that at one point I received and electronic message (email) claiming to be from Jennifer Randazza in regards to leaving her husband (I never was convinced that the message was really from Jennifer Randazza considering that I never received a follow up, but as of today I think it may have been, being that I did nothing but attempt to help Jennifer Randazza in the past when her husband was attempting to attain her name as a domain from Independent Investigative blogger Crystal Cox).

As of yesterday Crystal Cox asked if I would be willing to serve Marc Randazza with court papers. I replied NO. and let her know I NEVER want to be in physical proximity to him considering what I believe to be a death threat from him. It's ironic that as of today I was served at my home address.

Are Marc and Jennifer Randazza simply money whores? Was the electronic message I received in regards to Jennifer Randazza sent by Marc Randazza himself in effort to "set me up" and create false concern for her? Was the message sent in effort to prompt me to write a blog about what I believed to be Jennifer Randazza's situation (of which I never did after I tweeted about what I believed to be an electronic meeting with her)? Are both Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza willing to set up fabrications and scams in effort to utilize the courts to legally extort specific targets?

Also why would Marc Randazza be concerned about a piece of parody I created in regards to his possible future, when in the past he defended the right for someone to register and maintain GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn199­ during the Beck v. Eiland-Hall case? Has Marc Randazza completely lost his mind? I believe so in the name of Jesus Christ. I also believe Marc Randazza has issues looking at his own reflection in the mirror.

I will be counter suing him (if I can) for the pain and anguish his presence on Earth has caused me.

Friday, April 11, 2014

Monica Foster At Home 2014 - Thursday 04-10-2014

On today's webcast I focus on the question "Why hasn't the Free Speech Coalition fought for current and ex pornstars to receive residuals from the adult content they are featured in?"

Mainstream Hollywood actors and actresses receive residuals, so why not pornstars considering that the porn industry claims to be "crossing over" into mainstream? Why haven't Freee Speech Coalition mouthpieces such as James Deen, Stoya, Kayden Kross or Ron Jeremy ever brought up the issue?

I question why the Free Speech Coalition is attempting to monopolize performer testing and why people in the Free Speech Coalition such as Diane Duke and Mo Reese appear to have complete disregard for performer health and safety by opposing the condom mandates. Are they in actuality anti-porn activists?

Pornstars are legally defined as employees, so rather than the FSC worrying about STD testing subsidy funds, shouldn't they be enforcing the fact that porn companies (producers) should be covering the cost of porn talent STD / STI testing?

I share a few tweets directly from the Free Speech Coalition twitter account which are clear proof of the online bullying tactics the FSC utilizes towards pornstars who are diagnosed HIV positive and who choose to speak out to save the lives of their peers (such as Cameron Bay aka Cameron Adams who's last adult scene was with

I also share a tweet directly from the FSC twitter of which California Assemblyman Isadore Hall III is referred to as an "ass hat" (which is incredibly disrespectful and unprofessional considering that the Free Speech Coalition proclaims itself to be the "political face" and "lobbying group" of the pornographic industry).

I explain that many pornstars find themselves destitute after a career in the pornographic industry due to not having claim to residuals, and I present the case of Nina Devon (who played Rudy in Not the Cosbys XXX 2) as an example of a pornstar who would not have to live the dangerous life as an escort (it's only legal to work as an escort / prostitute in certain counties of Nevada) if she were entitled to residuals.

I conclude todays webcast by mentioning an email I received in regards to Wicked Pictures as to what may be the real reason why they've been one of the few condom mandatory companies for years, yet have been against condom legislation (I suggest my audience keep in mind that one of the final scenes the now HIV positive TJ cummings shot was for Wicked Pictures).