Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Monday, July 07, 2014
Friday, July 04, 2014
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
*Update 6.19.2014: Today I achieved my first legal victory against Marc Randazza - he failed to succeed in getting what he wanted from a judge in court today.
*Update 7.01.2014: Today my Motion for Dismissal wasn't granted, however I was successful in getting everything on court record via my paperwork which needed to be. Before the case began, I already won by allowing Jesus Christ in my life to restore & save my soul. I may not make it much longer, so please CLICK HERE to read my latest thoughts and evidence of the gangstalking (organized stalking) I've endured in a blog post I've entitled "Being in Porn Can Kill You, but Speaking Out About It is the Deadliest Part" .
I found the answers I was looking for. Click here to read the truth of how far the corruption goes in regards to the pornographic industry and politics: http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/?p=7683
If I died at this moment, I'd be OK with it. Everything (even elements I didn't anticipate) came full circle and I completed the puzzle.
My court date is July 1st, 2014. I don't even care as to the outcome. Anyone "fighting" me, in actuality is just fighting themselves.
I've been fortunate enough to do just about every single thing I've always wanted to do in life. I even have had the opportunity to do music...just recently...and you know what's funny? I don't ever need anyone to hear it. I just wanted the chance to do it.
Friday, May 16, 2014
|click to enlarge and download|
I am an intelligent woman who's brain is wired differently than most people's. I see things that escapes many, and I do my best to convey the best way I know how what I've noticed and experienced.
I have documented the history (to my knowledge) and my interactions with the above individuals: Diane Duke of the Free Speech Coalition, Sean Tompkins of TheRealPornWikiLeaks (TRPWL), Matthew Holder, Ari Bass aka Michael Whiteacre, Will Ryder aka Jeff Mullen, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, August Kurt Brackob aka Kurt Treptow and Julie Meadows aka Lydia Ann Lee on my various websites all linked through www.MindOfMonica.com (namely www.PornNewsToday.com, www.PornstarHookerAlert.com, www.MonicaAtHome.com & www.JewishDirt.com).
|Take a look at who's pulled pleadings in regards to this lawsuit . Jeff Mullen, Mathew Holder, Ari Bass - this will be on court record.|
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
For those who aren't aware, an In Forma Pauperis is essentially a "fee waiver" for court costs. As you my long time friends & followers know, I'm broke - in part due to having dedicated much of my life over the past few years to my activism in regards to issues pertaining to the pornographic industry such as the elements of organized crime and the much needed enforcement of workplace (health) safety legislation.
So as of last night, I wrote the Courts a Reply to the Opposition of support of my In Forma Pauperis. I need to redo my Affidavit for it (I didn't realize you had to itemize your income and assets), so I will as soon as possible.
I just don't get it. Randazza Legal Group should be good enough attorneys (Marc Randazza especially) to win fair and justly...shouldn't they? Why are they trying to fight my constitutional rights to be able to represent myself? They're a group of people with the scholastic background, professional experience and connections which amount to them essentially being a "Goliath" opposed to little 'ole me - a simple cam girl, ex-pornstar and blogger.
I'll keep you posted - you can download my reply to the court by clicking here.
FYI - Can you believe they dug up the issue of Lenny Dykstra in their Opposition? I mean COME ON!
Oh, and one more thing - it turns out I can attend court remotely via telephone :) Thank God for that little miracle considering I'm in fear for my life when it comes being in physical proximity to anyone attached to Marc Randazza and/or my stalkers who have stated on multiple occasions they'd be there.
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
WHY is it so difficult for Marc Randazza to understand that I AM NOT A PROSTITUTE? I AM A WEBCAM MODEL ONLY! In my view, this situation is more PROOF Randazza Legal Group is attempting to SEXTRAFFICK me into the Nevada legal brothels, strip clubs and/or back into the porn industry.
As of current, the ONLY people who regularly state that I'm an escort/prostitute/hooker are individuals Marc Randazza himself communicates with on twitter - my stalkers Ari Bass, Sean Tompkins & their associates.
Download my civil suit court case (filed against me by Randazza Legal Group) Motion to Dismiss here if you'd like to read it:
A court date for July 1st, 2014 has been set, however due to having received death, physical harm and rape threats from parties attached to Randazza Legal Group (of which March Randazza communicates with) who have stated that they will be attending, I will not be attending unless a miracle happens.
Keep in mind, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal group is the same man who just defended the racist Donald Sterling on CNN. In addition he (and the Free Speech Coalition) defends pedophilia and has been found to be affiliated with a known convicted pedophile.
In addition it appears that Matthew Holder, a close to 20 year pornographic industry cameraman (for studios such as Mile High Media & Penthouse) who I dated as an active pornstar is involved with Jennifer Randazza in the lawsuit. Matthew is not only the man who failed to disclose to me that he had Herpes and was involved in what resulted in an abortion of which I dealt with - in addition I was told by Keith Caggiano (of an adult novelty company called The Screaming O) after the final Halloween party I attended in Los Angeles, that Holder was my "pimp".
At this stage, just about everything in regards to the organized crime attached pornographic industry stalkers (who try to silence the truth) is now on court record via my Motion for Dismissal - and that was what needed to be done more so than anything else.
Monday, April 21, 2014
Debt Bondage, Sex Trafficking, Randazza Legal Group & Alexandra Mayers return to porn - a Monica At Home EASTER special
These actions by those affiliated with Randazza Legal Group appear to be an effort to incite physical harm (violence) against me and/or a murder. As of current I can not discuss the frivolous lawsuit of which Randazza Legal Group has filed against me seeking a judgement in excess of $50,000, but what I do know, is that the law suit appears to be an effort to attain my websites and sextraffick me into areas of the pornographic industry of which I'm not comfortable working in.
Click here for all the screencaps and evidence from today's webcast.
I believe Marc Randazza has a relationship with the Nevada brothels via Ari Bass aka Michael Whiteacre, Sean Tompkins (TRPWL) and Marc Spiegler. I believe their goal is to essentially sextraffick me into the Nevada legal brothel system by utilizing (and abusing) the Nevada courts to create a $10,000 debt of which I would have to pay to Jennifer Randazza if my motion to dismiss the lawsuit is not granted.
|click to enlarge|
I will present evidence which shows communication between Marc Randazza and those who claimed to take down pornwikileaks, but did not - as well as evidence of which I believe points to the initial communication I received (of which I believed was from Jennifer Randazza) in actuality being a "set-up" by Randazza Legal Group in effort to establish grounds for a lawsuit.
|click to enlarge|
the truth of
Regardless, I fear for my life at this stage. If I return to pornography I believe I am bound to contract HIV / AIDS - so if the Nevada courts rule against me - they are essentially a party to manslaughter (aka murder).
I believe the current situation of which I'm in, is solid evidence of how the pornographic industry will not allow performers to leave (or speak out).
Friday, April 18, 2014
On this webcast I discuss the truth of what I feel Michael Weinstein of the Aids Healthcare Foundation is really up against, why I feel his safety and life is in danger of an anti-Semitic hate crime and why every pornstar's life is currently in danger of a major corporation who's willing to put profits above the health and safety of human lives.
As of current a gay male model and pornstar by the name of Eric Paul Leue has created a petition on Change.org in effort to force Michael Weinstein to resign. The petition is "officially" backed by the Free Speech Coalition and Xbiz magazine, but I'm also under the impression that Eric Paul Leue is backed by the multi-million dollar pharmaceutical Gilead Sciences - the manufacturers of Truvada (a medication being marketed as "the new condom" though it doesn't protect against STDs other than HIV - further more the clinical definitive findings will not be published about Truvada until 2017).
At this stage, I feel that Gilead Sciences has targeted the Aids Healthcare Foundation and the Free Speech Coalition as a means of not only marketing Truvada, but a way to gain access to female pornstars to use as a "test subject" pool for Truvada clinical studies. As of current though Truvada has been found to be very effective in males, it hasn't been equally effective in clinical trials for females.
As of current Michael Weinstein in my view is the only person standing between female pornstars being used essentially as "lab rats" and Gilead Sciences.
Condom legislation must be adhered to and mandatory condom usage must be present in adult filming.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Today I give my closing statements for the week in regards to Tiffany Fox, organized crime, the Los Angeles porn industry and why a scholarship fund needs to be created for young women who speak out in regards to sex trafficking in the pornographic industry (which has essentially become a modern day slave system due to illegal escort and prostitution rings such as The Luxury Companion).
Monday, April 14, 2014
Sunday, April 13, 2014
This is a breaking news webcast in regards to Tiffany Fox aka Tiffany D'Gore (RealTiffanyFox), a young pornstar who has stated on twitter that Derek Hay of La Direct models not only wouldn't let her out of contract, but in addition has sex traffcked and sent to privates (aka escorting and/or prostitution gigs) rather than legitimate shoots.
Pornstars Natalia and Natasha Starr (the Starr sisters) have made similar allegations against Derek Hay in the past. Pornstar Lisa Ann aka Nailin' Pailin ( @theRealLisaAnn - she played Sarah Pailin in a porn parody) has come to Tiffany Fox's defense and has explained exactly how Derek Hay and LA direct model sextrafficks, women, blackmails pornstars and takes over their online adult industry aliases by registering their domain names and online presence.
In addition I discuss that fact that as of today of I was served with court papers of which I'm being sued for $10,000 by Jennifer Randazza (wife of pornographic industry attorney and public figure Marc Randazza - who defends child pornography, pedophilia and child abuse) for alleged defamation - which is strange considering that at one point I received and electronic message (email) claiming to be from Jennifer Randazza in regards to leaving her husband (I never was convinced that the message was really from Jennifer Randazza considering that I never received a follow up, but as of today I think it may have been, being that I did nothing but attempt to help Jennifer Randazza in the past when her husband was attempting to attain her name as a domain from Independent Investigative blogger Crystal Cox).
As of yesterday Crystal Cox asked if I would be willing to serve Marc Randazza with court papers. I replied NO. and let her know I NEVER want to be in physical proximity to him considering what I believe to be a death threat from him. It's ironic that as of today I was served at my home address.
Are Marc and Jennifer Randazza simply money whores? Was the electronic message I received in regards to Jennifer Randazza sent by Marc Randazza himself in effort to "set me up" and create false concern for her? Was the message sent in effort to prompt me to write a blog about what I believed to be Jennifer Randazza's situation (of which I never did after I tweeted about what I believed to be an electronic meeting with her)? Are both Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza willing to set up fabrications and scams in effort to utilize the courts to legally extort specific targets?
Also why would Marc Randazza be concerned about a piece of parody I created in regards to his possible future, when in the past he defended the right for someone to register and maintain GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com during the Beck v. Eiland-Hall case? Has Marc Randazza completely lost his mind? I believe so in the name of Jesus Christ. I also believe Marc Randazza has issues looking at his own reflection in the mirror.
I will be counter suing him (if I can) for the pain and anguish his presence on Earth has caused me.
Friday, April 11, 2014
On today's webcast I focus on the question "Why hasn't the Free Speech Coalition fought for current and ex pornstars to receive residuals from the adult content they are featured in?"
Mainstream Hollywood actors and actresses receive residuals, so why not pornstars considering that the porn industry claims to be "crossing over" into mainstream? Why haven't Freee Speech Coalition mouthpieces such as James Deen, Stoya, Kayden Kross or Ron Jeremy ever brought up the issue?
I question why the Free Speech Coalition is attempting to monopolize performer testing and why people in the Free Speech Coalition such as Diane Duke and Mo Reese appear to have complete disregard for performer health and safety by opposing the condom mandates. Are they in actuality anti-porn activists?
Pornstars are legally defined as employees, so rather than the FSC worrying about STD testing subsidy funds, shouldn't they be enforcing the fact that porn companies (producers) should be covering the cost of porn talent STD / STI testing?
I share a few tweets directly from the Free Speech Coalition twitter account which are clear proof of the online bullying tactics the FSC utilizes towards pornstars who are diagnosed HIV positive and who choose to speak out to save the lives of their peers (such as Cameron Bay aka Cameron Adams who's last adult scene was with Kink.com).
I also share a tweet directly from the FSC twitter of which California Assemblyman Isadore Hall III is referred to as an "ass hat" (which is incredibly disrespectful and unprofessional considering that the Free Speech Coalition proclaims itself to be the "political face" and "lobbying group" of the pornographic industry).
I explain that many pornstars find themselves destitute after a career in the pornographic industry due to not having claim to residuals, and I present the case of Nina Devon (who played Rudy in Not the Cosbys XXX 2) as an example of a pornstar who would not have to live the dangerous life as an escort (it's only legal to work as an escort / prostitute in certain counties of Nevada) if she were entitled to residuals.
I conclude todays webcast by mentioning an email I received in regards to Wicked Pictures as to what may be the real reason why they've been one of the few condom mandatory companies for years, yet have been against condom legislation (I suggest my audience keep in mind that one of the final scenes the now HIV positive TJ cummings shot was for Wicked Pictures).
Thursday, April 10, 2014
On today's webcast I discuss how my account was just deleted from the Jewish controlled Xbiz magazine's social networking site Xbiz.net without valid or justifiable reason (I haven't posted on their forum since porn industry attorney Marc Randazza posted the make and model of a car I had without my authorization suggesting that I drive off a cliff - was that a death threat?).
I review a post on JewishDirt.com I posted in regards to Xbiz and I question why another porn attorney by the name of Lawrence Walters Esq. appears to support the production of child pornography, while at the same time defends tube sites (which have been an element that's been financial devastating to the pornographic industry).
I also question why the Xbiz.net discussion forum is more focused on JewishDirt.com (which is an educational exploration of the Jewish community - it is not an anti-semetic website), than it is on the anti porn activists within the Free Speech Coalition who are attempting to overturn 2257 record keeping laws which protect minors and children from being exploited in adult content? Why am I personally, such a hot topic within the pornographic community?
Later in the webcast I inform the public that pornstars DO NOT receive residuals like mainstream Hollywood actors and actresses in America. I question why the Free Speech Coalition is not willing to fight for performers to receive residuals, yet they are willing to fight for porn producers to not have to pay for performer STD testing (which is something they are legally required to do being that performers are legally defined as EMPLOYEES). I take note that as of current Marc Randazza is claiming on Xbiz.com that it is legal to shoot pornographic content ANYWHERE in the United States (he cites the "people vs Freeman" case), even though it is common knowledge that it is only legal to shoot pornographic content in California and New Hampshire.
Lastly, I explain how the movie Not the Cosbys XXX 2 breaches obscenity laws, by desecrating the African-American (Black) institution "The Cosby Show", by depicting the character of Rude as a minor being molested (in otherwords the movie depicts child pornography - mainstream consumers did not expect to see such a scene in what was advertised as a mainstream porn parody).
Alexandra aka Monica Foster presents the latest pornographic industry news, first amendment issues, current events, legal sphere topics and drama.
At the start of the webcast I question why Mo Reese (a free speech coalition mouth piece) is irresponsibly telling the porn talent misleading information and propaganda in regards to AB 1576 and their self produced content for their websites and clips4sale stores.
I state the Mo Reese needs to clarify to the talent the AB 1576 will not affect SOLO pornstars who are SOLO in their websites, webcam show and clips4sale content.
I also question why Dr. Chauntelle Tibbals is attempting to spread the message to mainstream media that the condom legislation (existing and proposed) in regards to the porn industry, isn't to ultimately protect the health and safety of pornstars and sexworkers.
Dr. Chauntelle has never actually been a porn talent (as far as I know), so how exactly does she know what the pornographic industry system is actually like? Why doesn't she approach other porn studios to take up Wicked Picture's business model? Does she not realize that if most pornstars want to work, they are currently pressured NOT to use condoms (which is why condom legislation must be enforced to criminalize porn producers who don't follow the legislation).
Next I express why I think attorney general Eric Holder's gun control potential legislation is a good idea and I state that the Adult Entertainment Exo [correction - Adultcon] being moved to the same week as the Gun Expo in Las Vegas is a bad idea considering the sex and violence typically don't mix well.
Next I delve into the history and events surrounding Pornwikileaks and I explain about the lies and mistruths the Free Speech Coalition has told the public (even via wikipedia) in regards to the event of which released over 15,000 performers personal information to the public. I question whether or not the information on pornwikileaks really was from AIM (it could have been from a 2257 record keeping database such as the now closed 2257safe.com).
I also explain that the Free Speech Coalition's recent rise to power and influence is directly tied to and dependent upon their alleged involvement in closing Pornwikileaks (which is currently back online).
Last I explain how pornwikileaks may be used as an event or case in the Free Speech Coalitions fight to overturn 2257 record keeping laws - laws of which protect minors and children from being exploited in adult content. Being that the Free Speech Coalition has a history of defending child abuse and pedophilia, the 2257 laws must remain firmly intact.